CAUT
Conference on Women in the Professoriate:
"From Graduate Student to Professor Emerita"
24-26 Oct 2002
by Ruthanna
Dyer
This conference
was an opportunity to meet and network with women activists from
universities across Canada. I had hoped to come away with some
strategies and contract language to address the inequities that affect
women in the academy. Unfortunately the majority of time was spent
telling us how it is or as Ursula Franklin says, "awfulizing"
the situation. Only one and a half hours was devoted to participant
workshops and sharing of strategies.
Two contrasting
themes arose repeatedly:
Competition on
the uneven playing field of the universities and granting boards and
Collaboration to improve the conditions of the collective.
The
presentations by Ursula Franklin, Mary Eberts, Nancy Oliveri and
Margaret-Ann Armour were exceptionally thought provoking and enriching.
Each of these women clearly exemplified working for the collective and
shared their values with the group.
Betsy Troutt
from UMFA (Manitoba) shared their experience in addressing the differing
needs within the faculty association. The challenges of negotiating
for faculty close to retirement, younger faculty with the challenge of
parenting and tenure, and the faculty in their midyears who often were
hired with low starting salaries that continue to affect their status were
addressed by the creation of an intergenerational task force. The
task force was able to achieve a comprehensive bargaining package on
family leave benefits that were gender neutral. Many of these were
achieved in the current collective agreement.
Margaret-Ann
Armour, Professor Emerita at U.A. spoke of the mentoring process in clear
and practical terms. She stressed that one needed to be cautious in
choosing mentors to avoid being co-opted politically or made dependent on
the mentor. She stressed that one needs a mentor within one's
department and one outside the department to provide objective
perspective. She has been active in WISET, Women in Science, Engineering
and Technology. WISET is a funded activity at the UA that brings
women in the sciences together with leading researchers and science
educators. Her ability to explain how women differ in their approach to
scientific research was enlightening to the conference.
It was
surprising and disappointing to me that the conference planning committee
did not appear to plan for the needs of those of us who are differently
able. One workshop using theatre methods to raise awareness of
issues was based on the assumption that all participants were equally
able. Although the facilitators of the workshop did not plan for my
presence, the participants quietly accommodated me in the activities. The
McGill Faculty Club was the site for the conference dinner and was an
uphill walk from the hotel. No transportation arrangements had been
made for those of us who could not walk that distance, but arrangements
were announced for "group walk".
I found the
conference especially helpful in updating my knowledge of the bargaining
issues that face women within the university today. Unfortunately,
many of the issues had not changed appreciably since the time I was a
graduate student with a woman professor at the U of T in 1970!
|